Although California is the home of worldwide technological
innovation with Silicon Valley companies like Apple, Intel, and Adobe, the
public school system is not investing time, money or teacher training to teach
science.
Needs to change school culture, scheduling time, planning
time, using data including student data, designs for professional learning,
facilitating collaborative professional learning teams, evaluating learning,
both formative and summative assessment, roles of central office
administrators, the principal and the coaches for effective learning. The Center for the Future of Teaching and
Learning at WestEd the Lawrence Hall of Science at UC
Berkeley, and SRI International reported that 10% of elementary students
received regular hands-on science, and only one third of elementary teachers
felt they were prepared to teach science.
85% of these teachers also reported they’ve had no professional
development in the last three years. The
report, Untapped Potential, released in March 2012, states that:
The
research shows that:
- nearly 40 percent of teachers view students' lack of interest as a major or moderate challenge to science instruction.
- nearly half (47%) of principals report students' lack of preparation as a major or moderate challenge.
- nearly one-quarter of middle school teachers may not have an adequate background or preparation for teaching the subject.
- nearly 60 percent of surveyed teachers identified insufficient professional development as a barrier to high-quality science instruction.
- just 14 percent of middle school teachers provide a pattern of classroom practices that support regular engagement of students in the practices of science.
California is due to implement the new Common Core State
Standards in 2014-15. These were
developed by an initiative of the National Governors Association and the Council
of Chief State School Officers.
California is one of the 45 adopting states of these standards
representing a significant shift in teaching and learning of science
literacy. A series of focus groups
representing six subgroups of teachers, elementary (one group
consisted of teachers with more than 10 years of experience, and another
consisted of teachers with less than 10 years of experience1); middle and high school mathematics;
middle and high school science; middle and high school history/social studies;
and middle and high school English language arts, was commissioned by WestEd's
Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning in October 2011. The key finding reported was that teachers
did not feel prepared for the transition.
The Center recommended:
that
districts and schools take immediate action on the following:
- Educate teachers about the standards: how they were developed and teachers' role in that process; the goals and structure of the standards; and the expectations for how the standards will influence teachers' practice. Teachers must be assured that the CCSS will replace existing standards and that they will not be required to teach to both sets of standards simultaneously.
- Engage representative teachers in planning how the district will implement the new standards. Educate all teachers about the implementation process, including how it was planned (especially, teacher involvement), the implementation role of the individual teacher, and timelines.
- Create a climate in which it is acceptable for teachers to begin transitioning to the new standards without fear of being punished under current accountability measures. Districts will need to allay teachers' concerns that they may have to prepare students for the California Standards Tests at the same time they begin teaching to the CCSS.
- Provide intensive, ongoing professional development about the differences between current standards and the CCSS regarding content and pedagogy. Districts must explicitly unpack the two sets of standards, illuminating the gap between them and articulating the expectations under the new standards. If there is to be a successful transition to the new standards, teachers must have appropriate materials and resources, whether they are provided by the district or whether, with the district's blessing, they are identified or developed by the teachers themselves.
- Explain how new assessments will be linked to the CCSS
standards. There is a great deal of apprehension among teachers about how
the changes in standards will be assessed adequately, particularly how
critical thinking skills can be assessed in a standardized test. As soon
as they are made available, provide transparency about what the tests are
going to look like so that teachers can understand how each individual
standard is represented in the tests. In addition, once decisions about
the accountability system have been made, explain the role of the tests
within that system (e.g., the weighting of subject areas, grade levels
tested, other factors beyond tests that may be included). (CenterView: Willing but Not Yet Ready: A
glimpse of California teachers’ preparedness for the Common Core State
Standards
– Release Date: Feb 22, 2012)
Results on NAEP science tests show
California trails the nation in students’ scientific literacy. At the same
time, public opinion research finds that Californians strongly support
increased time and resources devoted to science education. ªCenterView: Scientific Literacy: The
Missing Ingredient
– Release Date: Feb 04, 2011)
– Release Date: Feb 04, 2011)
Teacher preparation programs will need to
help future teachers envision and enact new
strategies to foster deeper learning. (P21Webinar,
Developing Transferable Knowledge and skills, 2012)
ATC21S
recognizes that assessment is only one piece of the holistic
education-transformation approach. To make lasting change, educational systems
need to develop new curricula and provide teachers with professional
development to teach 21st century skills effectively in an information and
communications technology-rich environment.
http://atc21s.org/index.php/about/faqs/
References
•California
teachers lack the resources and time to teach science, LA Times, October
31, 2011
•Math and Science Teacher
Initiative, CSU
•Teach California
•The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning at WestEd
•Teach California
•The Center for the Future of Teaching and Learning at WestEd
•http://www.cftl.org/index_sci.php
•Untapped Potential: The status of
Middle School Science Education in California, March 22, 2012, accessed October
3, 2012 from http://www.cftl.org/Whats__New.htm.
•CenterView: Willing but Not Yet Ready: A glimpse of California teachers’
preparedness for the Common Core State Standards
– Release Date: Feb 22, 2012 accessed October 5, 2012 from http://www.cftl.org/CenterView.htm.
– Release Date: Feb 22, 2012 accessed October 5, 2012 from http://www.cftl.org/CenterView.htm.
•CenterView: Scientific Literacy: The Missing Ingredient
– Release Date: Feb 04, 2011accessed October 7, 2012 from http://www.cftl.org/CenterView.htm.
– Release Date: Feb 04, 2011accessed October 7, 2012 from http://www.cftl.org/CenterView.htm.
• http://atc21s.org/index.php/about/ ATCS21S Research Project
• P21Webinar, Developing Transferable Knowledge and skills,
2012 http://www.youtube.com/user/ptumarkin?feature=watch
•Why is Science Important? Vimeo
No comments:
Post a Comment