New advanced technologies can
assist teachers in communicating with their students effectively to make
students’ thinking visible, and to provide tailored feedback to meet specific
student needs (NRC, 2004; Owens, Irving, Pape, Abrahamson, & Sanalan, 2007;
Pape, Owens, & Irving, 2008; Roschelle, Penuel, & Abrahamson, 2004).
Studies on teacher to student feedback do not focus on specific aspects of learning science, such as argumentation and discourse skills.
(Duschl & Gitomer, 1997;
Nystrand & Gamoran, 1991; Webb, Nemer, & Ing, 2006; Windschitl et al.,
2008).
More cominglearning analytics
cohere
discourse
References
•Owens, D. T., Irving, K. E., Pape, S., Abrahamson, L., & Sanalan, V. A. (2007). The connected classroom: Implementation and research trial. In C. Montgomerie & J. Seale (Eds.), Proceedings of the ED-MEDIA World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications. Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
•Pape, S. J., Owens, D. T., & Irving, K. E. (2008). Classroom connectivity in promoting algebra 1 & Physical Science achievement and self-regulated learning: Year 1 results. Paper presented at the the 2008 IES Research Conference, Washington, DC.
•Roschelle, J., Penuel, W. R., & Abrahamson, L. (2004). The networked classroom. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 50-54.
•Duschl, R. A., & Gitomer, D. H. (1997). Strategies and challenges to changing the focus of assessment and instruction in science classrooms. Educational Assessment, 4(1), 37-73.
•Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 25(3), 261-290.
•Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008). How novice science teachers appropriate epistemic discourses around model-based inquiry for use in classrooms. Cognition and Instruction, 26(3), 310 - 378.
•Webb, N. M., Nemer, K. M., & Ing, M. (2006). Small-group reflections: Parallels between teacher discourse and student behavior in peer-directed groups. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(1), 63-119.
•
No comments:
Post a Comment